<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real T-Men Speak Out: Final Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ampedtraining.com/knowledge/real-tmen-speak-final-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ampedtraining.com/knowledge/real-tmen-speak-final-update/</link>
	<description>Logical Strength Training, Bodybuilding, and Fat Loss</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tillergoat</title>
		<link>http://www.ampedtraining.com/knowledge/real-tmen-speak-final-update/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Tillergoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ampedtraining.com/?p=1035#comment-708</guid>
		<description>One related FAIL in reasoning in that thread:  the relevance of pics.  Asking for pics makes sense for people claiming to be exceptions to the C. Butt calculated size limits.  If you claim to be an exception, a pic may be relevant to proving that you are.  

On the other hand, asking for pics of anyone questioning the claims made in T-Nation&#039;s advertising makes no sense.  You don&#039;t have to be a bodybuilder to apply basic critical thinking.  In the I, Bodybuilder thread, the critical thinking was fairly straightforward -- it was a case of applying scientific evidence (including C. Butt&#039;s work) to various advertising claims.  You don&#039;t have to be physically big to understand the issues in that regard.  Insisting that only huge bodybuilders can understand and evaluate T-Nation&#039;s advertising claims is akin to insisting that only a doctor who personally suffers from a disease can treat anyone with that disease.  That&#039;s just downright retarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One related FAIL in reasoning in that thread:  the relevance of pics.  Asking for pics makes sense for people claiming to be exceptions to the C. Butt calculated size limits.  If you claim to be an exception, a pic may be relevant to proving that you are.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, asking for pics of anyone questioning the claims made in T-Nation&#8217;s advertising makes no sense.  You don&#8217;t have to be a bodybuilder to apply basic critical thinking.  In the I, Bodybuilder thread, the critical thinking was fairly straightforward &#8212; it was a case of applying scientific evidence (including C. Butt&#8217;s work) to various advertising claims.  You don&#8217;t have to be physically big to understand the issues in that regard.  Insisting that only huge bodybuilders can understand and evaluate T-Nation&#8217;s advertising claims is akin to insisting that only a doctor who personally suffers from a disease can treat anyone with that disease.  That&#8217;s just downright retarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
