|
High Volume: What's the Story? |
|
Strength Training Articles
|
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Sunday, 29 June 2008 |
High Volume: What's the Story? When we discuss weight training, one of the key things we talk about is the volume of work done. Volume can mean different things to different people. To Mike Mentzer and the HIT gang, volume was the number of sets done. Most bodybuilders still think in these terms; the number of sets per body part. To athletes and strength coaches, volume takes on a different meaning. In this circle, volume is generally measured as the number of barbell lifts done (NL), or as the tonnage of a workout (sets * reps * weight used). Volume is also manipulated by the frequency of workouts. If you lift once a week, you'll have less volume than someone lifting three times a week, all things equal (note that this isn't always the case; you can take the workload of a single workout and spread it across multiple sessions). There's a pretty wide gap between these two groups, not to mention in between them. The bodybuilders will argue over doing just a few sets (HIT) or doing a whole lot of sets to "blast the part" (the high-volume workouts you read in the muscle mags). As a rule, if you're after physique goals, and aren't using steroids to help things along, you're better off keeping the volume in check. This doesn't mean one set, nor does it mean one workout every 21 days (this has actually been suggested, so I'm not making it up). It means keep things in check. What about strength athletes? Here it gets a little fuzzier. Bodybuilding requires a specific set of conditions, and creates a specific kind of stress in the muscle tissues. Strength gains can overlap with this on occasion, but by and large pure strength training is a different animal. This is what I want to talk about.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Testosterone Spikes: Predictor of Performance? |
|
Article Discussions
|
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Wednesday, 21 May 2008 |
Testosterone Spikes: Predictor of Performance? For a long time, I'd never really considered the hormonal aspects of training as being very important. It seems like a lot of wanking over what is, at best, a transient hormonal spike in response to a stimulus (in this case, exercise). We're talking brief here, like 45-60 minutes of increased testosterone which is, at best, a slight elevation off baseline. Steroid cycles have to magnify this level many times over to see drastic results. However, there has been some correlation between testosterone and cortisol levels with the condition of the athlete. The first group I'm aware of that really investigated it were Lon Kilgore and Glenn Pendlay, who determined that the ratio of testosterone to cortisol was an accurate predictor of the state of the athlete -- a marker of overtraining and overreaching, in other words. Pendlay, G. and L. Kilgore (2001). Hormonal fluctuation: A new method for the programming of training. Weightlifting USA 19(2): 15. Other (apparently unpublished) thesis research from Glenn Pendlay and Michael Hartmann has more or less confirmed that the test:cortisol ratio is depressed during hard training, but when unloading occurs it will sharply increase above baseline after adequate rest has occurred. It seems like there's definitely a correlation between testosterone levels and the athlete's condition, even if it's not responsible. Is there anything more to it? There just might be.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
So Bands Don't Work, Huh? |
|
Article Discussions
|
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Tuesday, 20 May 2008 |
So Bands Don't Work, Huh? The Effects of Combining Elastic and Free Weight Resistance on Strength and Power in Athletes Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research:Volume 22(2)March 2008pp 567-574 This study was undertaken to determine whether combined elastic and free weight resistance (CR) provides different strength and power adaptations than free weight resistance (FWR) training alone. Forty-four young (age 20 ± 1 years), resistance-trained (4 ± 2 years' experience) subjects were recruited from men's basketball and wrestling teams and women's basketball and hockey teams at Cornell University. Subjects were stratified according to team, then randomly assigned to the control (C; n = 21) or experimental group (E; n = 23). Before and after 7 weeks of resistance training, subjects were tested for lean body mass, 1 repetition maximum back squat and bench press, and peak and average power. Both C and E groups performed identical workouts except that E used CR (i.e., elastic resistance) for the back squat and bench press, whereas the C group used FWR alone. CR was performed using an elastic bungee cord attached to a standard barbell loaded with plates. Elastic tension was accounted for in an attempt to equalize the total work done by each group. Statistical analyses revealed significant (P < 0.05) between-group differences after training. Compared with C, improvement for E was nearly three times greater for back squat (16.47 ± 5.67 vs. 6.84 ± 4.42 kg increase), two times greater for bench press (6.68 ± 3.41 vs. 3.34 ± 2.67 kg increase), and nearly three times greater for average power (68.55 ± 84.35 vs. 23.66 ± 40.56 watt increase). Training with CR may be better than FWR alone for developing lower and upper body strength, and lower body power in resistance-trained individuals. Long-term effects are unclear, but CR training makes a meaningful contribution in the short term to performance adaptations of experienced athletes. Well, this goes a long way towards clearing up that misconception, I'd hope. Louie Simmons of Westside Barbell fame has been credited with bringing elastic bands to popularity in the training of strength athletes, but there's been a lot of resistance (haha) to the idea in some circles. The big reason, of course, was a lack of clinical research on the subject. In all fairness, this is actually a valid criticism -- otherwise, we'd be taking the bro-route of going by how it feels, yo.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Ephedra and Caffeine: No Good for Strength? |
|
Article Discussions
|
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Tuesday, 20 May 2008 |
Ephedra and Caffeine: No Good for Strength? The Effect of Ephedra and Caffeine on Maximal Strength and Power in Resistance-Trained Athletes Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research:Volume 22(2)March 2008pp 464-470 Caffeine and ephedrine-related alkaloids recently have been removed from International Olympic Committee banned substances lists, whereas ephedrine itself is now permissible at urinary concentrations less than 10 μg·mL-1. The changes to the list may contribute to an increased use of caffeine and ephedra as ergogenic aids by athletes. Consequently, we sought to investigate the effects of ingesting caffeine (C) or a combination of ephedra and caffeine (C + E) on muscular strength and anaerobic power using a double-blind, crossover design. Forty-five minutes after ingesting a glucose placebo (P: 300 mg), C (300 mg) or C + E (300 mg + 60 mg), 9 resistance-trained male participants were tested for maximal strength by bench press [BP; 1 repetition maximum (1RM)] and latissimus dorsi pull down (LP; 1RM). Subjects also performed repeated repetitions at 80% of 1RM on both BP and LP until exhaustion. After this test, subjects underwent a 30-second Wingate test to determine peak anaerobic cycling power, mean power, and fatigue index. Although subjects reported increased alertness and enhanced mood after supplementation with caffeine and ephedra, there were no significant differences between any of the treatments in muscle strength, muscle endurance, or peak anaerobic power. Our results do not support the contention that supplementation with ephedra or caffeine will enhance either muscle strength or anaerobic exercise performance. This was an interesting piece of information. I'm not sure how many of you have ever played around with pre-workout stimulants, but if you've ever been a fan of ephedra/ephedrine products, you'll know how they have a very strong effect on alertness and energy....which is a good thing if you're in need of some extra training intensity. Also, ephedra alkaloids (ie, the herbal form of the Ma Huang plant from which we get ephedra, not to be confused with ephedrine HCL which is a purified form) have recently been removed from the IOC banned list...which is an interesting move in itself.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Tuesday, 20 May 2008 |
|
I've been traveling around a bit lately, so it's been sparse on the updates as you can see. I'll try to keep things more updated, but you see how far my promises go. With that in mind, there's a new-ish blog that I'd highly suggest you pay attention to if you're interested in strength & conditioning. No gimmicks, no sales pitches, no Inner Circle -- just good, solid information from a real strength coach training real athletes. You can have a look here: http://willheffernan.blogspot.com Will's in Ireland, so you know what that means: he's drunk most of the day. Which is what lets him update his blog around 50 times per day. Go have a look. |
|
|
Guru Hate
|
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Tuesday, 08 April 2008 |
5-Dimensional Training! Dear fitness friend, Are you frustrated? Confused? Does your workout need a new kick? That was me, two years ago. I was in a rut. But then I discovered powerful new secrets that changed my physique, packing on slabs of raw muscle and melting the fat off like butter in a lobster dinner! Interested? You bet you are! READ ON!
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
An Open Letter to the IOC and WADA |
|
The War on Stupid
|
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Saturday, 05 April 2008 |
An Open Letter to the IOC and WADA 5 April 2008
An Open Letter to all members of the International Olympic Committee and all members of the World Anti-Doping Association:
I am greatly saddened by the recent news regarding the Greek weightlifting team and the positive drug tests from some of their number. This egregious violation is simply the latest in a long stream of constant dishonesty from the coaches and athletes of the world.
I want to commend the IOC and WADA for their efforts in screening out these unethical participants, those that choose to gain an unfair advantage over their competition.
However, I cannot help but feel that there is simply not enough being done to combat this problem. And make no mistake, this is a serious problem indeed!
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Borrowing or Theft? Where's the line? |
|
Guru Hate
|
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Saturday, 05 April 2008 |
Borrowing or Theft? Where's the line? In copyright law, there's a concept known as "Fair Use". The US Copyright Act (which can be found online at www.copyright.gov) states "purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." There are also other mitigating factors that are examined on a case by case basis.
So, using material for "reasonable purposes" is not against the law. What I'm doing here, criticizing and satirizing other copyrighted materials found on the Internet, is not a violation of copyright law. It falls under Fair Use.
Those of us that put ourselves out there as "experts" on the subject matter have an interesting dilemma. On the one hand, we benefit immensely from the free exchange of ideas. Most everything I know on exercise science has come from talking shop with people like me -- guys and gals that enjoy the topic and like to hash it out. Not unlike any other hobby, really.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Interview with Leigh Peele up now |
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Sunday, 30 March 2008 |
|
I just did an interview with Leigh Peele, who runs the Fat Loss Troubleshooter over at Avidity Fitness . You can read it here . I talk a little shop about the hows and whys of hatin' on Gurus, and give a little bit of outlook on the whole training process. Leigh's an all-around cool chick and a fellow Southerner. So go have a look. Or else. |
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Saturday, 29 March 2008 |
|
So, if you managed to sit through this, I give you props. My hosting company is having "problems with the SQL database, which they hope to resolve soon." I don't know about you, but reading sites that load up faster than a 14.4 kbps modem c. 1996 is pretty damn annoying. So they've got a few more days before I pull the plug and go elsewhere. I haven't forgotten my three faithful readers. Also, the first draft of the book is DONE. Working on edits now, and keeping fingers crossed it will be ready to go by the end of April. Stay tuned. |
|
|
Are you results-based or idea-based? |
|
Guru Hate
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Thursday, 20 March 2008 |
Are you result-based or idea-based?
One of the core problems facing everyone involved in fitness and strength training is how to figure out what is garbage and what is legitimately effective.
This can be difficult because the entire field of exercise science is still made up of a lot of unknowns. Most of the knowledge and things we take for granted today have come in large part from experts in the field, the coaches and trainers that actually work with various athletes.
Even then, there's a wide disagreement among these practitioners. A lot of it will really boil down to argument over fine details, as the general philosophies will usually line up.
But the devil can often be in the details; how do you know what you should listen to and what you shouldn't?
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|