|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Friday, 04 July 2008 |
A Closer Look at Cortisol I wrote this the other day after seeing yet another esteemed strength coaching expert repeat an all-too-common myth: the idea that cortisol, a key stress hormone in our bodies, is harmful to the athlete. This is based on the idea that cortisol increases during a workout, and cortisol is catabolic, therefore this is Bad Juju. As you'll read, there's more to it than this simplified explanation. Since I'm too lazy to post it in the CMS, you can read it at the web link here: Cortisol and You
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
High Volume: What's the Story? Part 2 |
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Tuesday, 01 July 2008 |
High Volume: What's the Story? Part 2 In the last segment , I went over the concept of high-volume/high-frequency training.
To summarize briefly, high volume weight training as used by bodybuilders isn't very productive; but a high volume of work used by strength athletes can be of benefit.
Why doesn't it work so well for bodybuilders? Bro-ish bodybuilders use high volume because they're after a pump. In their mind, the pump is more important than anything else; more important than progression, weight on the bar, or tension-time.
Since those concepts are the responsible factor behind muscle hypertrophy (aka, bigger muscles), these are what you should work on. Something like 5 sets of 5, or 3-4 sets of 10, or something along those lines will go a lot farther towards getting a muscle bigger than doing 10 variations of the same exercise for 5 sets of 12 each.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
High Volume: What's the Story? |
|
Written by Matt Perryman
|
|
Sunday, 29 June 2008 |
High Volume: What's the Story? When we discuss weight training, one of the key things we talk about is the volume of work done. Volume can mean different things to different people. To Mike Mentzer and the HIT gang, volume was the number of sets done. Most bodybuilders still think in these terms; the number of sets per body part. To athletes and strength coaches, volume takes on a different meaning. In this circle, volume is generally measured as the number of barbell lifts done (NL), or as the tonnage of a workout (sets * reps * weight used). Volume is also manipulated by the frequency of workouts. If you lift once a week, you'll have less volume than someone lifting three times a week, all things equal (note that this isn't always the case; you can take the workload of a single workout and spread it across multiple sessions). There's a pretty wide gap between these two groups, not to mention in between them. The bodybuilders will argue over doing just a few sets (HIT) or doing a whole lot of sets to "blast the part" (the high-volume workouts you read in the muscle mags). As a rule, if you're after physique goals, and aren't using steroids to help things along, you're better off keeping the volume in check. This doesn't mean one set, nor does it mean one workout every 21 days (this has actually been suggested, so I'm not making it up). It means keep things in check. What about strength athletes? Here it gets a little fuzzier. Bodybuilding requires a specific set of conditions, and creates a specific kind of stress in the muscle tissues. Strength gains can overlap with this on occasion, but by and large pure strength training is a different animal. This is what I want to talk about.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 4 of 34 |